Sign in or 
Location: Bill Tanner
Discussion: New Q and New Moneypenny
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this|
Posted Anonymously |
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
1. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Jan 27 2010, 9:21 PM EST
Q:1. John Clease, only him Moneypenny: im not sure but I do hope they pick someone who is as classy as Louis Maxwell was, not just some dumb girl who has looks. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
2. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Jan 28 2010, 12:00 PM EST
"Q:M should really have a male assistant at this juncture, and a female Q would put an interesting spin on things, too. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
3. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Jan 28 2010, 12:01 PM EST
"Q:NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
4. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Jan 28 2010, 12:07 PM EST
"Q:Hauer is an intriguing possibility. While Paltrow would make a fine Moneypenny, I doubt the producers would want to shell out $8-10 million for one or two scenes per movie. Do you find this valuable? |
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
5. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Jan 28 2010, 7:40 PM EST
"M should really have a male assistant at this juncture, and a female Q would put an interesting spin on things, too."that would indeed be cool to have a male assistant for M. as for Q i still think clease should be it Do you find this valuable? |
Goldeni7 |
6. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Jan 31 2010, 12:18 PM EST
Honestly, they need to stick with picking small-time, unknown actors and actresses who people don't know. Not always, but quite often these days, popular stars who are picked for Bond become duds. Halle Berry, Denise Richards and Madonna, just to name a few. Instead of Christmas Jones on screen, I see Denise Richards. Dud. I will give acknowledgement to Sean Bean, Jonathan Pryce, Judi Dench and select others for not sticking out like a sore thumb in the movies after they were chosen, but there are very few of these greats who were well-known before bond and have still made it work in Bond. Basically, stick to the unknowns unless it absolutely is going to work with a popular star.
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
7. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Feb 1 2010, 6:30 PM EST
the bond of old is boring, I loved that bond is now rouge . heck I think they should just have him just killing random people on screen for 2 hours now that would be one hell of a movie. I'd watch. aside in our modern society we need a politically correct bond. one that isnt a womanizer. we cant have the older bonds they are just plain wrong for our society. we want to attract the attention of today's youth. and that is action, not watching some guy get laid, If we wanted to do that theres free porn on the internet.
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
6-stringa007 |
8. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Feb 1 2010, 7:19 PM EST
"the bond of old is boring, I loved that bond is now rouge . heck I think they should just have him just killing random people on screen for 2 hours now that would be one hell of a movie. I'd watch. aside in our modern society we need a politically correct bond. one that isnt a womanizer. we cant have the older bonds they are just plain wrong for our society. we want to attract the attention of today's youth. and that is action, not watching some guy get laid, If we wanted to do that theres free porn on the internet."Go watch Crank and Bad Boys II and Transporter 3, Mr. Anony, u're on the wrong site. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
9. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Feb 1 2010, 8:41 PM EST
"the bond of old is boring, I loved that bond is now rouge . heck I think they should just have him just killing random people on screen for 2 hours now that would be one hell of a movie. I'd watch. aside in our modern society we need a politically correct bond. one that isnt a womanizer. we cant have the older bonds they are just plain wrong for our society. we want to attract the attention of today's youth. and that is action, not watching some guy get laid, If we wanted to do that theres free porn on the internet."Wow I REALLY hope your joking because that sounded so so wrong. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
10. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Feb 1 2010, 9:10 PM EST
"Honestly, they need to stick with picking small-time, unknown actors and actresses who people don't know. Not always, but quite often these days, popular stars who are picked for Bond become duds. Halle Berry, Denise Richards and Madonna, just to name a few. "Halle was good; she was in a dud of a Bond movie. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
11. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Oct 18 2010, 11:20 PM EDT
Simon Pegg as the new Q, Moneypenny would be better off being an unknown...
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
SirKnight61 |
12. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Feb 11 2011, 11:31 AM EST
"Q:I agree Cleese comes back, but fail that and a wonderful update would be yes Michael Caine if he is not going back to BATMAN. Then he needs to stay Alfred to Bales Batman. Since they may have (rumor) written out Morgan Freeman now in Batman he too could step into the role of Q I as well agree in many ways Moneypenny might he very interesting now if a male for Dame Judy to play off. And sorta give Bond blue balls in the mix now. Allen Cummins? Nick Lachey? possible actors to do this is wonderful. And could keep Bond and Moneypenny's relationship true to its CORE VALUES but in a new and interestingly different way. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
13. RE: New Q and New Moneypenny
Jul 20 2011, 3:20 PM EDT
q ] rowan atkinson
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
