Sign in or 

|
6-stringa007 |
Villains for Bond #23
Sep 11 2009, 7:40 AM EDT
| Post edited: Sep 11 2009, 8:44 AM EDT
Martin Sheen has recently said that the rumors of him playing Blofeld are untrue. To be honest, I'm glad to hear this. Sheen could be a good Bond villain, but don't make it Blofeld. Lets have original villains or unused Fleming ones. My idea for Bond #23;Edward Norton as Jack Spang - business/brains behind baddies schemes. Michael Madsen as Serrafimo Spang - cold-blooded hitman type who has a good vicious fist brawl to the death with Craig. What are your thoughts? 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
1. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Sep 11 2009, 9:38 AM EDT
"Martin Sheen has recently said that the rumors of him playing Blofeld are untrue. To be honest, I'm glad to hear this. Sheen could be a good Bond villain, but don't make it Blofeld. Lets have original villains or unused Fleming ones. My idea for Bond #23;I'd love it if they brought Drax back. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
6-stringa007 |
2. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Sep 11 2009, 5:41 PM EDT
"I'd love it if they brought Drax back."Lol... 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
3. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 5 2009, 9:27 PM EDT
i wish they would let Christopher Walken be a bad guy again.. i loved Max Zorin, so he could be a great villain. oh, and why not let a woman go after bond.. that would be cool..
2
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
4. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 5 2009, 10:34 PM EDT
I wanna see BLOFELD again!
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Budjettivaje |
5. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 2:30 AM EDT
"I wanna see BLOFELD again!"Me too! Most of the people say that it's not worth it to bring back a villain who's last seen in the 70s. I disagree with them! They should even TRY to bring back Blofeld. If the movie sucks because of Blofeld they can always abandon the character for good. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
6. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 2:44 AM EDT
i'd like to see blofeld and may day back in the fray
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
7. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 3:04 AM EDT
"Me too! Most of the people say that it's not worth it to bring back a villain who's last seen in the 70s. I disagree with them!Why not remake Goldfinger with Nathan Lane, or, in another nod to the past, make Nick Nack the head of S.P.E.C.T.R.E? Do you find this valuable? |
|
Budjettivaje |
8. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 4:08 AM EDT
On my opinion both Goldfinger and Nick Nack are characters that were SUPPOSED to use only once. That's why.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
9. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 11:48 AM EDT
"On my opinion both Goldfinger and Nick Nack are characters that were SUPPOSED to use only once. That's why."Which doesn't mean they can't be used again. Do you find this valuable? |
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
10. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 12:47 PM EDT
I wanna see Blofeld come back all badass and have a fight scene with bond and everything. Gahh its too bad Donald Pleasence died, he was the best blofeld...
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Budjettivaje |
11. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 12:48 PM EDT
"Which doesn't mean they can't be used again."Sure it doesn't but I think most people would wonder if they were brought back. It's a little bit same thing with Blofeld also but since Goldfinger and Nick Nack were originally and even in the Flemings novels disposable characters it would be lesser surprising to bring back Blofeld. Do you find this valuable? |
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
12. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 12:50 PM EDT
But they can finally use him and not be introuble! I think why not, since this is bond when he is younger
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Budjettivaje |
13. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 1:09 PM EDT
"But they can finally use him and not be introuble! I think why not, since this is bond when he is younger"Hope your talking about Blofeld because if you do, I agree with you. Do you find this valuable? |
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
14. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 1:16 PM EDT
"Hope your talking about Blofeld because if you do, I agree with you."yes i am! :D Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
15. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 1:29 PM EDT
"Sure it doesn't but I think most people would wonder if they were brought back. It's a little bit same thing with Blofeld also but since Goldfinger and Nick Nack were originally and even in the Flemings novels disposable characters it would be lesser surprising to bring back Blofeld."Some people LIKE surprises! 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
16. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 6 2009, 10:31 PM EDT
"I wanna see Blofeld come back all badass and have a fight scene with bond and everything. Gahh its too bad Donald Pleasence died, he was the best blofeld..."If Blofeld is to return I hope they get Dennis Franz to play him. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Budjettivaje |
17. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 7 2009, 2:36 AM EDT
| Post edited: Oct 7 2009, 2:37 AM EDT
"Some people LIKE surprises!"Quite true but in Bond-movies surprise means change and change means that old clichés are cut out. And that's something the fans don't like. For example, most people in here demand that in Bond 23 at least Q and Moneypenny are brought back and the gunbarrel comes in the very end. And bringing back disposable enemies would mean breaking those clichés. Though since Nick Nack didn't die, he could be brought back but definitely not as the leader of SPECTRE. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
18. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 7 2009, 2:43 AM EDT
"Nick Nack could be brought back but definitely not as the leader of SPECTRE. "Why not? If legal issues prevent using Blofeld, why not give the job to Nick Nack? 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
S.P.E.C.T.R.E |
19. RE: Villains for Bond #23
Oct 7 2009, 2:57 AM EDT
"Why not? If legal issues prevent using Blofeld, why not give the job to Nick Nack?"there wouldnt be any legal issues, eon owns that character fully now 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |