Location: Megan Fox turns down next Bond

Discussion: why notReported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / General Discussion
Showing 2 posts
firestormsl
firestormsl
why not
Sep 2 2009, 2:27 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 2 2009, 2:27 PM EDT
if she got to be a bond girl she would be apart of an exclusive club of woman. yes i say she would make a good bond girl because if she can do transforming cars she can do this. Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)

Posted Anonymously
1. RE: why not
Dec 20 2009, 3:16 AM EST | Post edited: Dec 20 2009, 3:16 AM EST
"if she got to be a bond girl she would be apart of an exclusive club of woman. yes i say she would make a good bond girl because if she can do transforming cars she can do this."
totally absolutely WRONG and HELL-NO dude.

the person's face and facial features and body language and all that, has to fit into the story. and Megan Fox just is not it.

not to mention that alot of the reasons why people did not [originally] like Daniel Craig as [the next] James Bond is because, even though he can ACT and/or BEHAVE like James Bond, he does not have the FACE of James Bond.

just look at the novels, and/or the drawings Ian Fleming made of James Bond. Pierce Brosnan looks more like "James Bond" than Daniel Craig has, does, and/or will. (no offense to him, because the dude literally KICKS ASS [ / is AWESOME] as an actor.) Do you find this valuable?