Location: Hugo Drax

Discussion: loserReported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 - 16 of 16  |  Show  posts at a time

JamesBond00
loser
Aug 29 2009, 9:49 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 29 2009, 9:49 PM EDT
drax is a big loser and everyone should know that. 006 is 100 times better Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)

Posted Anonymously
1. RE: loser
Aug 30 2009, 10:19 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 30 2009, 10:19 AM EDT
"drax is a big loser and everyone should know that. 006 is 100 times better"
Drax is the best Bond villain of all in the best Bond movie of all.
Do you find this valuable?    

JamesBond00
2. RE: loser
Aug 31 2009, 3:54 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 31 2009, 3:54 PM EDT
"Drax is the best Bond villain of all in the best Bond movie of all."
moonraker was pretty cheesy.
Do you find this valuable?    
6-stringa007
6-stringa007
3. RE: loser
Aug 31 2009, 7:56 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 31 2009, 7:56 PM EDT
"moonraker was pretty cheesy."
Indeed, the 3rd worst in the series, only better than DAD and AVTAK. Concur about 006 - I love the final confrontation between him and 007.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
4. RE: loser
Aug 31 2009, 9:09 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 31 2009, 9:09 PM EDT
MOONRAKER was the last Bond epic to truly enthrall the entire world. The film's influence/impact was sooo encompassing, in fact, the world was not enough. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
6-stringa007
6-stringa007
5. RE: loser
Aug 31 2009, 9:46 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 31 2009, 9:46 PM EDT
"MOONRAKER was the last Bond epic to truly enthrall the entire world. The film's influence/impact was sooo encompassing, in fact, the world was not enough."
It may have been a commercial success (it made lotsa money) but that doesn't mean everyone likes it. It wasn't that well received critically when it was released anyway. Sure, it had it's moments, like the pre-title scene and the Amazon boat chase, but that's about all I can think of that I liked. The hovercraft bit in Venice was the silliest moment in the whole franchise. Overall, I just found MR to be a retread of TSWLM, only not as good and with obvious Star Wars influence. FYEO got the series back on track, as did TLD, GE and CR, to name a few.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
6. RE: loser
Sep 1 2009, 8:22 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 1 2009, 8:22 PM EDT
"Indeed, the 3rd worst in the series, only better than DAD and AVTAK. Concur about 006 - I love the final confrontation between him and 007."
DAD was bad but i liked AVTAK. Gotta love 006.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
7. RE: loser
Sep 2 2009, 1:35 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 2 2009, 1:35 PM EDT
"Drax is the best Bond villain of all in the best Bond movie of all."
They'll never top Moonraker.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

JamesBond00
8. RE: loser
Sep 7 2009, 9:30 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 7 2009, 9:30 PM EDT
"They'll never top Moonraker."
bla bla bla. :-)
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
9. RE: loser
Sep 8 2009, 3:21 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 8 2009, 3:21 AM EDT
Hugo Drax is Bond's most cunning and deadly adversary. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Budjettivaje
Budjettivaje
10. RE: loser
Sep 8 2009, 5:47 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 8 2009, 5:47 AM EDT
I think Drax belongs to the top 10 worst Bond-villains.
I wouldn't say Moonraker is the worst Bond-movie. I know it was quite 'unbondish' but still more believable than Die Another Day , right?
Personally I don't like 006. The way they maid that 00-agent vs. 00-agent was a bit clumsy. Or at least I felt so.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
11. RE: loser
Sep 8 2009, 1:43 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 8 2009, 1:43 PM EDT
"I think Drax belongs to the top 10 worst Bond-villains.
I wouldn't say Moonraker is the worst Bond-movie. I know it was quite 'unbondish' but still more believable than Die Another Day , right?
Personally I don't like 006. The way they maid that 00-agent vs. 00-agent was a bit clumsy. Or at least I felt so."
Villains are SUPPOSED to do their WORST, and Drax delivered, putting Bond -- and THE WORLD -- in constant peril.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
12. RE: loser
Sep 25 2009, 10:35 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 25 2009, 10:35 PM EDT
"I think Drax belongs to the top 10 worst Bond-villains.
I wouldn't say Moonraker is the worst Bond-movie. I know it was quite 'unbondish' but still more believable than Die Another Day , right?
Personally I don't like 006. The way they maid that 00-agent vs. 00-agent was a bit clumsy. Or at least I felt so."
i like your pick. dario is my second favorite bond baddie
Do you find this valuable?    
Budjettivaje
Budjettivaje
13. RE: loser
Sep 26 2009, 11:14 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 26 2009, 11:14 AM EDT
"i like your pick. dario is my second favorite bond baddie"
Well thank you. Too bad the text in it is so small though it's 'joke' sucks anyway.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
14. RE: loser
Sep 26 2009, 11:32 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 26 2009, 11:32 AM EDT
"i like your pick. dario is my second favorite bond baddie"
He's #3 for me, behind Jaws and May Day.
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
15. RE: loser
Sep 27 2009, 10:04 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 27 2009, 10:04 AM EDT
Just because he's been floating in space for the last thirty years doesn't make Hugo Drax any more a loser than Auric Goldfinger. Do you find this valuable?