Location: James Bond Wiki Discussion Forum

Discussion: WORST BONDReported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / General Discussion
Showing 41 - 60 of 60  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3
CodeNamePredator
CodeNamePredator
40. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 5 2009, 10:19 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 5 2009, 10:19 PM EST
"YES THEY DO. Moore had a few good movies, but MR, AVTAK, and TMWTGG were lame. period."
FYEO.....Moores best Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
41. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 12:51 AM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 12:51 AM EST
Lazenby. Physically convincing but doesn't always say his lines perfect. The only reason they hired him was cos he looks kinda like Connery, or so they said. and my only problem with Moore was that he stuck around too long. He was like 57 or 58 on AVTAK. WTF??? Do you find this valuable?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
42. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 3:54 AM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 3:54 AM EST
"FYEO.....Moores best"
not a bad choice, but, many 007 fans n critics say that it waz tha 'SPY'. Tha ERN (008) Do you find this valuable?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
43. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 3:57 AM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 3:57 AM EST
"Lazenby. Physically convincing but doesn't always say his lines perfect. The only reason they hired him was cos he looks kinda like Connery, or so they said. and my only problem with Moore was that he stuck around too long. He was like 57 or 58 on AVTAK. WTF???"
The Producers, according 2 some reports. waz that they couldn't find any body else 4 the 007 role @ the time. u're rite, he did stick around 2 long. Tha ERN (008) p.s.- tha LAZ was good physically, and in the fights. something ur man moore couldn't do. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
44. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 4:14 AM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 4:14 AM EST
"Moore stuck around too long. He was like 57 or 58 on AVTAK. WTF???"
So what? It's not like he was required to wear tights or anything. 0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
45. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 1:01 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 1:01 PM EST
"So what? It's not like he was required to wear tights or anything."
no, but u don't want 'BARNABY JONES'roger moore, 2 keep on w/ tha Bond @ his age.it waz time 2 go. Tha ERN (008) 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
46. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 3:37 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 3:37 PM EST
"So what? It's not like he was required to wear tights or anything."
He'd have looked marvelous in them, though! 0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

007FANATIC
47. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 4:31 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 4:31 PM EST
"He'd have looked marvelous in them, though!"
no. ever heard of the word disgusting? 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
48. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 8:42 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 8:42 PM EST
"He'd have looked marvelous in them, though!"
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tha ERN (008) Do you find this valuable?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
49. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 8:44 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 8:44 PM EST
"no. ever heard of the word disgusting?"
apparently, the anons haven't. Tha ERN (008) 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
beatlehead
beatlehead
50. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 6 2009, 9:20 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 6 2009, 9:20 PM EST
"It's not like he was required to wear tights or anything."
Now THERE'S an image... 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
51. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 7 2009, 1:40 AM EST | Post edited: Mar 7 2009, 1:40 AM EST
"He'd have looked marvelous in them, though!"
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tha ERN (008) 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
52. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 8 2009, 3:01 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 3:01 AM EDT
"The Producers, according 2 some reports. waz that they couldn't find any body else 4 the 007 role @ the time. u're rite, he did stick around 2 long. Tha ERN (008) p.s.- tha LAZ was good physically, and in the fights. something ur man moore couldn't do."
yep that is true. although I will say (this is just my opinion) that I don't really think there's been a BAD actor at Bond out of the 6 of them, I just happen to like some more than others. Do you find this valuable?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
53. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 8 2009, 4:37 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 4:37 AM EDT
"yep that is true. although I will say (this is just my opinion) that I don't really think there's been a BAD actor at Bond out of the 6 of them, I just happen to like some more than others."
amen 2 that anon. 'tha ERN 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
54. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 8 2009, 3:41 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 3:41 PM EDT
"He'd have looked marvelous in them, though!"
Sounds yummy! 0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

007FANATIC
55. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 8 2009, 5:44 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 5:44 PM EDT
"yep that is true. although I will say (this is just my opinion) that I don't really think there's been a BAD actor at Bond out of the 6 of them, I just happen to like some more than others."
I agree. There were no bad actors, just some that were better than others. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

JustinAtheropinion
57. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 8 2009, 6:16 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 6:16 PM EDT
"yep that is true. although I will say (this is just my opinion) that I don't really think there's been a BAD actor at Bond out of the 6 of them, I just happen to like some more than others."
Holy...!

An anonymous poster who makes sense!!!

Bravo! 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

JustinAtheropinion
58. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 8 2009, 6:17 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 6:17 PM EDT
"Dalton might be fine, but LTK was awesome? The death of the cold war? AIDS? Trying times killed Bond for a decade."
There's a lot of Fleming in LTK, as you well know, Alex... 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
spywholuvsu
spywholuvsu
59. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 9 2009, 3:09 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 3:09 AM EDT
"Holy...!

An anonymous poster who makes sense!!!

Bravo!"
no kiddin'. they must've landed finally. Tha ERN 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

007FANATIC
60. RE: WORST BOND
Mar 9 2009, 5:34 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 5:34 PM EDT
"yep that is true. although I will say (this is just my opinion) that I don't really think there's been a BAD actor at Bond out of the 6 of them, I just happen to like some more than others."
So true. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Previous | 1 2 3

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)
Best 007 Sean is Best Best bond is
Corinne Dufour Best 007 Daniel craig OVIOUSLY
The best James Bond you forgot the very first bond.... best bonds
Mistakes to add to list My order Roger Moore