Sign in or 

|
Posted Anonymously |
Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 17 2009, 7:21 PM EST
I can't figure out why all you damn kids think that Daniel Craig is such a good Bond. Obviously it's not his fault that none of the classic moneypenny and Q scenes are in the more recent Casino Royale and Quantum, but he's not a particularily good actor, and does nothing the same as the Sean Connery, who was the original. The only thing you should really be debating is how close the other actors came to achieving a Connery-like performance.
19
out of
31 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
JustinAtheropinion |
1. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 17 2009, 7:56 PM EST
"I can't figure out why all you damn kids think that Daniel Craig is such a good Bond. Obviously it's not his fault that none of the classic moneypenny and Q scenes are in the more recent Casino Royale and Quantum, but he's not a particularily good actor, and does nothing the same as the Sean Connery, who was the original. The only thing you should really be debating is how close the other actors came to achieving a Connery-like performance."George Lazenby made the mistake of trying to copy Connery--look what happened to him! Connery was quite afield from the Fleming Bond, and that's what the screen-Bond SHOULD be based on. You DO read, don't you? But then, why am I even debating this with a troll? ("Damn kids" they say, I'm at least twice as old as you are, for certain) 3 out of 9 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
QuartermasterQ |
2. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 18 2009, 1:21 AM EST
The idea is to not copy Connery and make something new. Moore made it funnier, Dalton made it darker, Brosnan brought Bond back to us all and with more ass kicking and not so dark, and Craig makes it more the like the books and more cold. They all realized they needed to change if they wanted to be remembered for themselves as opposed to who was closest to Connery.
3
out of
6 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Benjuk |
3. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 18 2009, 8:24 AM EST
Funny how the thread starting negative posts always seem to be from 'Anonymous'. I sense someone trying to stir things up.Personally I find Craig's Bond to be very enjoyable specifically because he's NOT like any of the others. Connery was Connery, not Bond. Moore was Moore, as always. Dalton (for me) was trying to be a dark Connery. Brosnan was trying to be a tougher Roger Moore. Lazenby, I won't even go there. Craig is Craig. 3 out of 7 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
LJNYC |
4. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 18 2009, 3:46 PM EST
Yes, Connery is hard to beat and is my fave, I grew up with those films - fantastic. It's funny why you assume everyone is a "damn kid" in the forum, most "damn kids" I know favor Roger Moore as Bond!! Sorry Anonymous, Craig is the closest to portraying the brutality of Bond, as Sean did , though Connery's is suaver; everyone back in the day thought he was hot - women were fantasizing like crazy and he was macho enough to appeal to men in a non-threatening sense. Craig is more rugged looking and not near as suave as Sean. All the angst about Q and Moneypenny - anyone think they may show up in future films? If you think Craig's "not a particularly good actor", go Netflix a few - I doubt you will - you probably didn't realize it was him in "Road To Perdition", as Paul Newman's evil screwed-up son, check out "Layer Cake" , "Flashbacks Of A Fool", "Munich", "Enduring Love", "Defiance". Why are some people concerned about the lost frivolity and the return of the brutal aspects of Fleming's 007??.......Hello - he's an assassin!!! Take care.
3
out of
5 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
JustinAtheropinion |
5. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 18 2009, 4:04 PM EST
".......Hello - he's an assassin!!! "Well, that's my vote for "Quote of the Week" 3 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
LORDJIM |
6. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 31 2009, 8:20 AM EST
"I can't figure out why all you damn kids think that Daniel Craig is such a good Bond. Obviously it's not his fault that none of the classic moneypenny and Q scenes are in the more recent Casino Royale and Quantum, but he's not a particularily good actor, and does nothing the same as the Sean Connery, who was the original. The only thing you should really be debating is how close the other actors came to achieving a Connery-like performance."you daniel craig haters and doubters were proved wrong. its time to shut up now. i always said he would be a great bond from the begining. nearly everyone likes him as bond , check out the box office results. and only a few like you feel the need to put him down. what does that say about your opinion? 2 out of 7 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
beatlehead |
7. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 31 2009, 9:22 AM EST
".......Hello - he's an assassin!!! "An assassin with a heart of gold. ;) 1 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
koolkikij |
8. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 31 2009, 11:44 AM EST
"An assassin with a heart of gold. ;)"or with a heart of black, esp. after vesper. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
PussyGalore |
9. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Jan 31 2009, 3:55 PM EST
"I can't figure out why all you damn kids think that Daniel Craig is such a good Bond. Obviously it's not his fault that none of the classic moneypenny and Q scenes are in the more recent Casino Royale and Quantum, but he's not a particularily good actor, and does nothing the same as the Sean Connery, who was the original. The only thing you should really be debating is how close the other actors came to achieving a Connery-like performance."I absolutely agree with you. I mean all the girls I know saw he's hot. I mean really, hes like a fish! 1 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
beatlehead |
10. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Feb 1 2009, 3:16 AM EST
"I absolutely agree with you. I mean all the girls I know saw he's hot. I mean really, hes like a fish!"I've heard of "crazy like a fox" but "hot like a fish?" That's a new one! lol 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
11. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Mar 26 2009, 7:58 PM EDT
Daniel Craig is almost perfectly ... inexpressive ! Besides, he doesn't have that natural charming, classy style a Bond character must have in order not to appear as blunt nor stuck-up. Bond should not try to convince with pure bodypower.
3
out of
6 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
jamesbond2 |
12. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Mar 27 2009, 7:54 AM EDT
"I can't figure out why all you damn kids think that Daniel Craig is such a good Bond. Obviously it's not his fault that none of the classic moneypenny and Q scenes are in the more recent Casino Royale and Quantum, but he's not a particularily good actor, and does nothing the same as the Sean Connery, who was the original. The only thing you should really be debating is how close the other actors came to achieving a Connery-like performance."I agree that if you compare connery and craig together they barley fit, but I anyway think craig is good( but not best) 1 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
jamesbond2 |
13. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Mar 27 2009, 7:56 AM EDT
"The idea is to not copy Connery and make something new. Moore made it funnier, Dalton made it darker, Brosnan brought Bond back to us all and with more ass kicking and not so dark, and Craig makes it more the like the books and more cold. They all realized they needed to change if they wanted to be remembered for themselves as opposed to who was closest to Connery."that was a wonderful sentance 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
14. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Mar 27 2009, 1:39 PM EDT
First George Lazenby did NOT make the mistake of trying to "copy "Sean Connery at all.....As back In the Sixties the "Connery Bond" WAS the Cinema James Bond - thus Lazenby WAS REQUIRED to "Be THAT Exactly Same Bond"....hence the Same hat...the Same Light blue suit...the Same Brown Golf outfit.... "SAME Old James" as Miss Moneypenny said....also we saw the characters FROM the Connery Bonds depicted in the opening sequence of O.H.M.S.S.- he had items from those films plus a similar car chase scene going after Tracy's car ...as Connery does in Goldfinger with Tilly Masterson's....as Lazenby's Bond is introduced... Lazenby DID add other aspects...falling in love etc...but to the (then) Basic SAME cinema Bond character.....at that point it was envisaged Bond was a set character, and would remain so whoever portrayed him.... It was Roger Moore who later changed things.......No hat in the Gun barrel scene....different clothes style ...NO Aston Martin, smoking cigars, etc....and a lighter tone DC to me seems FAR more "Bond-ish" when he is HIMSELF in interviews...Lighter, a Dry wit...a cool relaxed disposition...confident...good banter with the interviewer....we MUST now see THOSE QUALITIES in his version of Bond So far he's Only been allowed to be an "Expressionless Walking Guided Missile"....throughout ! The PRODUCERS MUST NOW let DC actually play a new version of Bond....that is his own version, tho' STILL recognisable as the character.... 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
007FANATIC |
15. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Mar 27 2009, 2:35 PM EDT
"I can't figure out why all you damn kids think that Daniel Craig is such a good Bond. Obviously it's not his fault that none of the classic moneypenny and Q scenes are in the more recent Casino Royale and Quantum, but he's not a particularily good actor, and does nothing the same as the Sean Connery, who was the original. The only thing you should really be debating is how close the other actors came to achieving a Connery-like performance."No. You are just wrong. Craig = awesome. Period. 007 (and Craig) FOREVER!!! 1 out of 7 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
QuartermasterQ |
16. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Mar 28 2009, 3:57 PM EDT
""SAME Old James" as Miss Moneypenny said....also we saw the characters FROM the Connery Bonds depicted in the opening sequence of O.H.M.S.S.- he had items from those films plus a similar car chase scene going after Tracy's car ...as Connery does in Goldfinger with Tilly Masterson's....as Lazenby's Bond is introduced..."I think the purpose of that was to tell the audience that its the same character, same series, same Bond basically. It was the first time they made an actor change and they wanted the audience to know it the same character. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
moore4ever |
17. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute rubbish
Mar 28 2009, 4:15 PM EDT
All the Bond's made their character different from each others. As we have said many, many times; Moore was a lighter tone, Connery morphed the character into what made Bond famous, Lazenby was lover, Dalton was a dark tone version. Brosnan was suave, laid back killer, while Craig is still proving himself to the audienece and critics, yet he has showin already that he is trying to "be" the Bond from the books.
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
18. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute NOT rubbish
May 11 2009, 1:59 PM EDT
DANIEL CRAIG IS THE FITTEST ACTOR THAT HAS EVER PLAYED JAMES BOND AND I WOULD LOVE HIM TO STAY AS BOND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So Shut ya face.................... :(
1
out of
7 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
19. RE: Daniel Craig is absolute NOT rubbish
May 11 2009, 2:01 PM EDT
Finally..someone who talks sense..you are so funny by the way..xx
2
out of
4 found this valuable.
Do you?
|