Sign in or 

|
alexberg |
Latest page update: made by alexberg
, Sep 17 2009, 8:34 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
6 words added 3 words deleted 1 image added view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
blofeld
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | View on Blofeld | 7 | Oct 19 2011, 3:01 AM EDT by Anonymous | ||
|
|
Thread started: Dec 9 2009, 7:56 PM EST
Watch
The Blofeld of the books was not bald, did not have a cat, and didn't wear Nehru suits. I think they should get an actor that could portray the menace of the literary Blofeld *(who ended up going mad from syphilis in "You Only Live Twice") not the cartoonish figure from the early films. The actor should also be older than Daniel Craig. Then again why bring Blofeld back at all? S.P.E.C.T.R.E. existed in the books beyond Fleming's writings when Blofeld's illegitimate daughter took over the organization in "For Special Services" and Tamil Rahani took over after her in "Role of Honour" and "Nobody Lives Forever". Maybe it is time to mine the many books written by John Gardner, which are filled with beautiful women, ingenious gadgets, evil villains and their henchmen, exotic locales, and other Bond mainstays.
|
||||
| Mr_Univers | Continuity out of hand! | 4 | May 8 2010, 3:33 AM EDT by Mr_Univers | ||
|
Thread started: May 7 2010, 8:47 AM EDT
Watch
Blofeld? Really? Didn't we dump him down a smokestack thirty years ago? And SPECTRE is so last century. I mean maybe that sounded ominous back in 1962 but today it belongs in an Austin Powers movie. But if they're going to reboot the whole franchise as if Bond 1-20 never happened then I guess we can get him married again.
|
|||||
| Anonymous | WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO JAMES BOND | 0 | Apr 18 2010, 10:42 PM EDT by Anonymous | ||
|
|
Thread started: Apr 18 2010, 10:42 PM EDT
Watch
Why has Bond's image been reinvented for Daniel Craig? He is no longer a womanizer( if you blinked during Quantum, you missed his one tryst).They seem more interested in showing Craig undressed than the Bond girls. And whatever happened to his sarcastic wit? This guys portrayal is too dark. And where is Moneypenny, Q, or Charles? How about a gadget or two? These are things that James Bond fans have appreciated over the past fifty years.It seems like all the groundwork Connery and Bronson created has been removed from the Bond persona. I hope the writers don't forget why we love Bond in future films. Unless the role is being written expressly for female audiences
|
||||