Sign in or 

| Main | Other Bond Films | Fast Facts | Novel | Community Reviews | Pics & Clips |
| |
Bond: "Does it look like I give a damn?"
Distinguishing Feature: (According to mi6.co.uk)
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
tommyt40 |
Latest page update: made by tommyt40
, Oct 28 2009, 4:47 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
more grammar
- tommyt40
37 words added 11 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
bond girl
CASINO ROYALE
daniel craig
james bond
james bond 007
James Bond Actor
james bond casino royale
james bond movie
Reboot
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| northbreed | "Casino Royale": Worst Bond Film Ever, Part 3 (page: 1 2) | 36 | Oct 16 2009, 8:17 PM EDT by 6-stringa007 | ||
|
Thread started: Jul 12 2007, 5:17 PM EDT
Watch
[continued from Part 2 of review]
5) Producer infamy/creative poverty: Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli, the film’s producers, lacking the vision and ingenuity to advance Bond’s personal timeline onscreen, reveal their creative bankruptcy by bringing 007 back to the beginning of his secret service career, presenting him in his most unflattering incarnation yet. Out go Bond’s cinematically-cultivated charm and conviction. The new Bond is an uninteresting, expressionless, muscle-bound nihilist and a disgracefully vulnerable “hero.” The producers deliberately emphasize Bond’s vulnerability by subjecting him, incredibly, to cardiac arrest(!) as well as a horrific trial of torture (this latter was a rotten, graphic part of Fleming’s original novel). Putting obstacles in a purposeful screen hero’s path makes for good drama; but these shocking “Casino-Royale” examples are an extremely sick way to challenge a hero and are certainly artistically unworthy of depiction onscreen. Considering all these points, it is clear that “Casino Royale” is neither value-driven art nor fan-pleasing entertainment. The proof is in the picture. “Casino Royale” is the highest-grossing Bond film to date. But consider: 1. This fact merely indicates the degree of public curiosity about or interest in James Bond and owes virtually everything to the franchise’s longstanding cinematic appeal and reputation (earned by much better films and performances in the series and betrayed dramatically by “Casino Royale”). 2. This fact confirms nothing about public satisfaction with or approval of this latest installment. 3. High box-office numbers neither reflect nor establish this film’s merit. The 2-disc [Region 1] DVD special edition of this movie has a handful of special features. Apart from the inclusion of Maryam d’Abo’s thoughtfully-produced “Bond Girls Are Forever” (2002) documentary, why should you care? |
|||||
| QuartermasterQ | Something I noticed | 11 | Jun 11 2009, 9:19 PM EDT by QuartermasterQ | ||
|
Thread started: Jun 5 2009, 5:54 PM EDT
Watch
Recently Casino Royale has made its network debut on USA and is on for four nights in a row. It started last night and will continue tonight, saturday, and sunday. Anyway, watching it last night, I noticed something interesting.
During the opening credits, there is an animation sequence where men are being killed by the suits from a card deck. A man is killed with a red diamond sticking from his chest, another with a black spade sticking from his chest, etc etc. Now, keeping that in mind, the title song that is played over these animations (You Know My Name by Chris Cornell) has a lyric in it that goes as following: "I've seen diamonds cut through harder men.". What I noticed is that the line coincides perfectly with the animation of a man being killed by the red diamond. We are literally seeing diamonds cut through harder men as the song suggests : ). Did anyone else happen to notice this? Was it the perfect coincidence? Or a cleverly hidden connection for fans to find? |
|||||
| mkfreeberg | So what happened to the money? | 2 | Jun 5 2009, 9:40 PM EDT by Dalton007 | ||
|
Thread started: Jun 5 2009, 12:19 AM EDT
Watch
It was set up as a classic "promise the boss the world, then worry about delivering." Bond realizes he's been double-crossed, says he'll head off to the bank right away to deposit the winnings. And then drama...crumbling building...flooding...Vesper dies...Mr. White gets the money. Then Bond kneecaps White. Cliffhanger!
Well we now know from Quantum of Solace, that (spoilers here)...Mr. White got away, and as of that moment nobody talked about money ever again. I think they completely blew this. It was a major cliffhanger, major maguffin, major reason to go see QoS, and it was just plain dropped. And that goes for the Quantum organization itself, by the way, which is a completely different subject. But what about that money? |
|||||